ISSUE FOCUS 72 FEED & ADDITIVE MAGAZINE September 2024 gy. In this trial, three groups of birds were fed with different treatments: a negative control, a group with antibiotics (BMD, hereafter B), and a group with a combination of phytogenics and phycogenics. The birds were placed on reused litter to create a mild necrotic enteritis (N.E.) challenge. The performance results were consistent with other experiments, showing that NQ technology provided as good or better performance compared to other treatments (cf Fig.3). With over 30 trials worldwide, the NQ technology has demonstrated a clear advantage over other technologies, particularly older phytogenics. It is now used in broilers, laying hens, and other species, both as a standalone additive and to optimize feed formulation. CONCLUSION: EMBRACING THE LATEST PHYTOGENIC TECHNOLOGIES The phytogenic market was still in its infancy two decades ago and has since developed significantly, addressing essential industry needs driven by new regulations, consumer expectations, and technical advancements. The early pioneers who explored the potential of plants and herbs laid the groundwork for this growth. However, with the passage of time, new technologies have elevated industry standards, making phytogenic feed additives even more effective. Through the discovery and application of new metabolites from plants and seaweed, alongside the development of advanced manufacturing technologies, the industry has developed more reliable solutions: products with high concentration and stability, greater safety for workers and animals, and consistent performance with better economic returns. Extensive research supports these advancements, and there is no longer a reason to rely on outdated products when new technologies are both affordable and more effective. The pioneers who launched the first phytogenics 20 years ago have not significantly upgraded their technologies. Looking ahead, continued innovation in sourcing natural molecules and improving processing methods will bring more transparency and science and will further drive the evolution of the feed industry and support sustainable animal nutrition in the future. Fig.3 Performance 2,40 2,45 2,50 2,55 2,60 2,65 2,70 BWG (kg) 4,00 4,02 4,04 4,06 4,08 4,10 4,12 FI (kg) 1,50 1,51 1,52 1,53 1,54 FCR 0,29 0,30 0,30 0,31 0,31 BWG (kg) 0,36 0,37 0,38 0,39 0,40 0,41 FI (kg) 1,24 1,26 1,28 1,30 1,32 1,34 1,36 1,38 FCR Performance results 0-14d Performance results 0-42d NC B NQ
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTUxNjkxNQ==